The World's Luckiest Casino Cruises 2026

Take the tour

Tap a number along the route to work through the top ten, or drag the ship.

Reviews read
Mentioning luck
Last year

The ranking

3,598 Tripadvisor reviews across 15 cruise ship casinos, read in full. The figure is the share of a ship's English-language reviews mentioning luck or happiness. Tap any row for the workings and the confidence range.

All 15 ships


1	Diamond PrincessPrincess Cruises · Grand Casino	YokohamaJapan	131	16.8%	–
Reviews analysed 131 Mentioning luck 22 Share 16.8% 95% confidence range 11.4% – 24.1% 2025 rank 1 Region Asia 22 of 131 reviews = 16.8%. On this sample the true figure is very likely between 11.4% and 24.1%.
2	Regal PrincessPrincess Cruises · Princess Casino	Fort LauderdaleFlorida, USA	212	16.0%	New
Reviews analysed 212 Mentioning luck 34 Share 16.0% 95% confidence range 11.7% – 21.6% 2025 rank New entry Region Americas 34 of 212 reviews = 16.0%. On this sample the true figure is very likely between 11.7% and 21.6%. · vs Diamond Princess: p=0.854 (within sampling variation)
3	Anthem of the SeasRoyal Caribbean International · Casino Royale	SeattleWashington, USA	362	13.5%	New
Reviews analysed 362 Mentioning luck 49 Share 13.5% 95% confidence range 10.4% – 17.4% 2025 rank New entry Region Americas 49 of 362 reviews = 13.5%. On this sample the true figure is very likely between 10.4% and 17.4%. · vs Diamond Princess: p=0.363 (within sampling variation)
4	Celebrity InfinityCelebrity Cruises · Fortunes Casino	AthensGreece	192	13.0%	▼ 1
Reviews analysed 192 Mentioning luck 25 Share 13.0% 95% confidence range 9.0% – 18.5% 2025 rank 3 Region Europe 25 of 192 reviews = 13.0%. On this sample the true figure is very likely between 9.0% and 18.5%. · vs Diamond Princess: p=0.345 (within sampling variation)
5	Wonder of the SeasRoyal Caribbean International · Casino Royale	MiamiFlorida, USA	106	12.3%	▼ 3
Reviews analysed 106 Mentioning luck 13 Share 12.3% 95% confidence range 7.3% – 19.9% 2025 rank 2 Region Americas 13 of 106 reviews = 12.3%. On this sample the true figure is very likely between 7.3% and 19.9%. · vs Diamond Princess: p=0.328 (within sampling variation)
6	Emerald PrincessPrincess Cruises · Gatsby's Casino	Los AngelesCalifornia, USA	138	11.6%	▼ 2
Reviews analysed 138 Mentioning luck 16 Share 11.6% 95% confidence range 7.3% – 18.0% 2025 rank 4 Region Americas 16 of 138 reviews = 11.6%. On this sample the true figure is very likely between 7.3% and 18.0%. · vs Diamond Princess: p=0.221 (within sampling variation)
7	Queen ElizabethCunard Line · Empire Casino	SeattleWashington, USA	268	11.6%	▼ 2
Reviews analysed 268 Mentioning luck 31 Share 11.6% 95% confidence range 8.3% – 16.0% 2025 rank 5 Region Americas 31 of 268 reviews = 11.6%. On this sample the true figure is very likely between 8.3% and 16.0%. · vs Diamond Princess: p=0.149 (within sampling variation)
8	AzuraP&O Cruises · The Casino	VallettaMalta	472	11.4%	▼ 1
Reviews analysed 472 Mentioning luck 54 Share 11.4% 95% confidence range 8.9% – 14.6% 2025 rank 7 Region Europe 54 of 472 reviews = 11.4%. On this sample the true figure is very likely between 8.9% and 14.6%. · vs Diamond Princess: p=0.102 (within sampling variation)
9	Oasis of the SeasRoyal Caribbean International · Casino Royale	Cape LibertyNew Jersey, USA	283	9.9%	New
Reviews analysed 283 Mentioning luck 28 Share 9.9% 95% confidence range 6.9% – 13.9% 2025 rank New entry Region Americas 28 of 283 reviews = 9.9%. On this sample the true figure is very likely between 6.9% and 13.9%. · vs Diamond Princess: p=0.045 (a real difference)
10	Royal PrincessPrincess Cruises · Princess Casino	SeattleWashington, USA	250	9.6%	New
Reviews analysed 250 Mentioning luck 24 Share 9.6% 95% confidence range 6.5% – 13.9% 2025 rank New entry Region Americas 24 of 250 reviews = 9.6%. On this sample the true figure is very likely between 6.5% and 13.9%. · vs Diamond Princess: p=0.041 (a real difference)
11	Symphony of the SeasRoyal Caribbean International · Casino Royale	GalvestonTexas, USA	317	9.5%	New
Reviews analysed 317 Mentioning luck 30 Share 9.5% 95% confidence range 6.7% – 13.2% 2025 rank New entry Region Americas 30 of 317 reviews = 9.5%. On this sample the true figure is very likely between 6.7% and 13.2%. · vs Diamond Princess: p=0.028 (a real difference)
12	RivieraOceania Cruises · The Casino	SeattleWashington, USA	178	9.0%	▼ 2
Reviews analysed 178 Mentioning luck 16 Share 9.0% 95% confidence range 5.6% – 14.1% 2025 rank 10 Region Americas 16 of 178 reviews = 9.0%. On this sample the true figure is very likely between 5.6% and 14.1%. · vs Diamond Princess: p=0.039 (a real difference)
13	Harmony of the SeasRoyal Caribbean International · Casino Royale	Port CanaveralFlorida, USA	290	7.6%	New
Reviews analysed 290 Mentioning luck 22 Share 7.6% 95% confidence range 5.1% – 11.2% 2025 rank New entry Region Americas 22 of 290 reviews = 7.6%. On this sample the true figure is very likely between 5.1% and 11.2%. · vs Diamond Princess: p=0.004 (a real difference)
14	Allure of the SeasRoyal Caribbean International · Casino Royale	Fort LauderdaleFlorida, USA	294	6.8%	New
Reviews analysed 294 Mentioning luck 20 Share 6.8% 95% confidence range 4.4% – 10.3% 2025 rank New entry Region Americas 20 of 294 reviews = 6.8%. On this sample the true figure is very likely between 4.4% and 10.3%. · vs Diamond Princess: p=0.001 (a real difference)
15	Icon of the SeasRoyal Caribbean International · Casino Royale	MiamiFlorida, USA	105	5.7%	New
Reviews analysed 105 Mentioning luck 6 Share 5.7% 95% confidence range 2.6% – 11.9% 2025 rank New entry Region Americas 6 of 105 reviews = 5.7%. On this sample the true figure is very likely between 2.6% and 11.9%. · vs Diamond Princess: p=0.009 (a real difference)

Cruise line	Reviews	Lucky reviews
Princess Cruises4 ships in the study	731	13.1%
Celebrity Cruises1 ship in the study	192	13.0%
Cunard Line1 ship in the study	268	11.6%
P&O Cruises1 ship in the study	472	11.4%
Royal Caribbean International7 ships in the study	1757	9.6%
Oceania Cruises1 ship in the study	178	9.0%

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

Data and analysis by Gambling.com